Contexts and Propositions

نویسنده

  • Friederike Moltmann
چکیده

This paper concerns itself with the relation between two important semantic notions: the traditional notion of proposition and a more recent notion of context as an information state. The notion of proposition has traditionally played an important role in the theory of meaning: propositions are entities that have independent truth conditions and act as the meaning of both independent and embedded sentences as well the objects of propositional attitudes such as assertion and belief. The notion of context is important in the semantics of natural languages for obvious reasons since many expressions depend on features of the utterance situation or the relevant stage of the discourse for their evaluation. Two seemingly quite different notions of context, though, have come to play a role in semantic analysis only one of which will be of concern in this paper. One notion is that of an utterance context, a context whose features include the time of the utterance, the speaker, and the speaker's intentions as to what he is referring to with the utterance of particular expressions. The other notion of context which is the one relevant for this paper represents the content of the presuppositions made at the relevant stage of the discourse. Such a presuppositional context systematically changes with an increase of information in the discourse both during the utterance of a sequence of sentences and the utterance of certain complex sentences with conjunctions, conditionals, or quantifiers. A presuppositional context figures in recent semantic analyses of various phenomena: it has been taken to determine the acceptability of sentences with presuppositions, as providing information about the evaluation of unbound anaphoric pronouns, and as providing the basis of evaluation of epistemic modals and indicative conditionals. Theories making use of a presuppositional context generally assign it a central role for the meaning of a sentence. There are two views regarding the relation between a presuppositional context and sentence meaning. On one view, a presuppositional context is taken to be meaning-determining, determining whether a sentence expresses a proposition and if so which proposition it expresses. On another, more recent, dynamic view, meaning is taken to be context-determining, the meaning of a sentence itself being 2 identified with its potential of changing one context to another. I will argue that presuppositional context is neither meaning-determining nor are there any semantic operations on meaning. Rather the content of a sentence is independent of any presuppositional context. The …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Interval-Valued Fuzzy Propositions. An Application to the L-Fuzzy Contexts with Absent Values

In order to obtain the information from an L-Fuzzy context, the complete relation between the objects and the attributes is needed. However, the contexts that model many situations have absent values. To solve this problem, at the beginning of the paper we remind the interval-valued linguistic variable definition and, later, we propose an extension of the fuzzy propositions to the interval-valu...

متن کامل

A Theoretical Framework for Several Antecedents of Shared Leadership in Corporate Board Contexts

Due to the gap in understanding board leadership and specifically, board shared leadership, this article aims at proposing some antecedents of the emergence of board shared leadership. This article incorporates three bodies of literature: Team effectiveness, team leadership, and board management. Based on integrating several theoretical perspectives, nine propositions are developed in relation ...

متن کامل

Contexts as Shared Commitments

Contemporary semantics assumes two influential notions of context: one coming from Kaplan (1989), on which contexts are sets of predetermined parameters, and another originating in Stalnaker (1978), on which contexts are sets of propositions that are "common ground." The latter is deservedly more popular, given its flexibility in accounting for context-dependent aspects of language beyond manif...

متن کامل

Tense, Modality, and Semantic Values

Here is a rough sketch of what I take to be an attractive, albeit naı̈ve, picture (its attractiveness I take to be obvious; its naiveté, though perhaps also obvious, will be discussed shortly). A primary purpose of a semantics for a natural language is to compositionally assign to sentences semantic values that determine whether the sentences are true or false. Since natural languages contain co...

متن کامل

The Construct of State-Level Suspicion: A Model and Research Agenda for Automated and Information Technology (IT) Contexts

OBJECTIVE The objective was to review and integrate available research about the construct of state-level suspicion as it appears in social science literatures and apply the resulting findings to information technology (IT) contexts. BACKGROUND Although the human factors literature is replete with articles about trust (and distrust) in automation, there is little on the related, but distinct,...

متن کامل

Discourse: Codes and Clues in Contexts

Some of the meaning of a discourse is encoded in its linguistic forms. Thls is the truth-conditional meaning of the propositions those forms express and entail. Some of the meaning is suggested (or 'implicated', as Grice would say) by the fact that the encooer expresses just those propositions in just those linguistic forms in just the given contexts [2]. The first klnd of meaning is usually la...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1996